Mazda CX-5 MOT failure rates: what fails, what to fix

TL;DR

Mazda CX-5 vehicles commonly face MOT failures in brakes, suspension, lighting, and emissions. Older models, particularly those aged 6-10 years, have higher failure rates. Repair costs can vary, with brake repairs typically between £150-£300 and suspension repairs ranging from £200-£500.

Common MOT Failure Categories

The Mazda CX-5 often fails its MOT in key areas. The most frequent issues include brakes, suspension, lighting, and emissions. These categories account for the majority of failures reported in DVSA data.

Age-Related Failure Rates

As the CX-5 ages, its failure rate tends to increase. Models between 6 to 10 years old experience a notable rise in failures, particularly related to suspension and braking systems. This trend highlights the importance of regular maintenance as the vehicle ages.

Cost of Repairs

Repair costs can vary significantly based on the type of failure. Brake repairs typically range from £150 to £300, depending on whether pads or discs need replacing. Suspension issues can be more expensive, with costs ranging from £200 to £500. Emissions failures may require more in-depth diagnostics and repairs, which can also add to the overall cost.

Quick Fixes vs Structural Issues

Many common failures can be resolved with quick fixes. For instance, replacing a blown bulb is often inexpensive and straightforward. However, structural issues, such as rust or corrosion, can lead to serious problems. These issues are more costly to repair and can result in a failed MOT if not addressed.

What people are asking

What are the main problems of the Mazda CX-5?

Common problems include issues with the diesel particulate filter (DPF), fuel injectors, and occasional electrical faults. Owners have reported that these issues can lead to performance problems if not addressed promptly.

Is a Mazda CX-5 a reliable car?

Overall, the Mazda CX-5 is considered a reliable vehicle, but some owners report specific issues with earlier models. Many find that regular maintenance helps maintain its reliability over time.

What years to avoid when buying a Mazda CX-5?

Buyers often advise caution with the 2012 and 2013 models due to reported mechanical issues. These years have been highlighted for problems that could affect long-term ownership satisfaction.

Which is more reliable, RAV4 or CX-5?

While both vehicles are known for reliability, some owners suggest the RAV4 may have a slight edge based on long-term performance. However, many CX-5 owners are satisfied with their vehicle’s dependability.

What owners say

Mazda CX-5 owners often share their experiences regarding reliability and common faults in various online communities. These problems can lead to performance drops and increased emissions, which may affect MOT results. Many users report that while the CX-5 is generally reliable, some have encountered issues with the fuel injectors, particularly in older models.

Another common theme among owners is the suspension system. This wear can lead to MOT failures, making regular checks essential for maintaining performance and safety. Users mention that suspension components can wear out over time, especially in models aged 6-10 years.

When it comes to value, many owners appreciate the CX-5’s balance of performance and comfort. Buyers in UK communities have flagged that the CX-5 holds its value well compared to some competitors. Discussions highlight that while it may not be the cheapest SUV on the market, its reliability and driving experience often justify the price.

However, some owners caution against specific model years. This has led some potential buyers to consider newer models or those with a more robust service history. Insights suggest that the 2012 and 2013 models may have more frequent issues, particularly with the DPF and electrical components.

Overall, the Mazda CX-5 has a strong following, with many owners praising its driving dynamics and comfort. Yet, like any vehicle, it is important to stay informed about common issues and ensure regular maintenance to avoid potential MOT failures.